Site
created 12/15/97.
|
|
page
created: 5/23/02
Home
Theater: An Archaeology
Part
One
by
Robert Harris, special to The Digital Bits
Robert
A. Harris - Main Page
|
Since biblical times, mortals have desired to view motion pictures
in the privacy of their own homes, to enjoy with family and friends.
These early forms of motion pictures (many carved in stone) had the
problem of not being particularly portable - and many were silent to
boot.
And the public was forced to wait for better times, during which
technology could catch up with the desire for entertainment.
Finally, beginning in the early part of the twentieth century with
the formation of studios, the advent of the star system and the
birth of Hollywood, those chosen few - studio heads, top stars and
the extremely wealthy - began to view motion pictures at home, and
the concept of the home theater was born.
35mm projectors were installed in home screening rooms,
projectionists were hired to run the equipment and those lucky few
were able to entertain their friends and colleagues with first run
motion pictures.
Note: There have been many superb articles written on the subject
of early home cinema. My objective here is simply to make those who
are unaware of it
aware. Therefore, I have left out 28mm,
9.5mm, etc.
Finally, in or around 1923, with the invention of the 16mm
projector, motion pictures began to make their way from the
undeniably connected and wealthy, to schools, shut-in situations
(hospitals, prisons, etc.), military bases and
Non-theatrical 16mm rental and sale companies.
Kodascope prints were created for rental and sale, generally in
shortened versions of feature length films - and the people
rejoiced.
From the 1940s through the early 1980s 16mm prints were produced
for varying purposes of virtually every feature film that came out
of Hollywood. At first they were printed directly from original 35mm
negatives and tracks, but with the rise in popularity in various
venues, 16mm prints proliferated, and dupe negatives became the
state of the art. 16mm prints become more and more available and
collectable to those who desired to actually own sub-standard copies
of their favorite films.
In some cases 8mm or Super 8mm prints of complete features became
available. Probably at least twenty times as many people bought home
movie versions in these formats as ever collected them in 16mm.
With collecting in full gear in the 1960s and 70s, clean 16mm
prints of titles such as East of Eden,
Casablanca,
Sullivan's Travels and others
were available on the collector's market for anywhere from $50-75
for the more common titles to several thousands of dollars if one
wanted a dye transfer Technicolor print of The
Adventures of Robin Hood, North
by Northwest, The Red Shoes,
The Searchers or, one of the
consummate rarities -- Gone with the Wind.
16 and 35mm film collecting was looked upon by the studios (at
least in the past) as a quasi-legal hobby. Few 16mm prints were
actually sold by the studios with the exception of some titles from
the pre-1949 Warner library. Most of the "legal" prints
were gifted to filmmakers for their personal libraries. Because of
this, there was a seemingly secret society that surrounded
collecting, with everything short of a special handshake and secret
rites, in which blood and nitrate film might be combined in a
cauldron of steaming oil.
Taking up great amounts of space and costing tens of thousands of
dollars, these film collections, along with collections based on the
35mm and 70mm formats are still very much a part of the playground
of a tiny part of the population which loves film and takes it very
seriously. These prints could be run in their proper screen
proportions or formats - 1.37:1, 1.66, 1.75, 1.85 or CinemaScope and
Panavision anamorphic widescreen of 2.35 or wider.
Then in the early 1970s something new emerged.
Video tape recorders.
Originally available in ¾ inch format from Sony and others,
and with a tape length topping out at 60 minutes, one could tape
their favorite films from television - commercials and all for about
$75 -100 per title. And what one was able to place upon one's shelf
was a low quality broadcast version with cuts, edits, time
compression and of course, only pan and scan versions of the newer
wide screen releases.
Nearly concurrent with ¾" units, Sony's first ½"
recorders appeared on the scene. First recording only black and
white and then in color, these machines would enable one to again
record off the air to a 60-minute reel to reel tape and start a
library.
The Betamax arrived not long after and some astute studios realized
that there might be a market for people that, for whatever reason,
wanted to watch not only old films but newer titles at home.
And whatever master tapes happened to be lying around were used to
create something called "home videos."
Quality was generally abysmal, and one was basically purchasing the
same old transfer than was used for broadcast - only now without
commercials; generally without cuts; but most definitely in pan and
scan and mono sound.
As I understand it, Sony owned the patents to Beta, and not wishing
to have others produce Beta machines and tapes and thereby share the
marketplace, they held onto their little piece of the world - Beta -
which was a rather high quality piece of equipment.
But where did this leave everyone else?
Out of the marketplace.
And VHS was born - a lower quality system for the masses.
But VHS had certain, very positive attributes, among which were the
ability to record in a 120-minute (or longer) format, greater
availability and lower prices than Betamax.
It caught on.
Suddenly small mom and pop rental stores began to appear across the
landscape of America. Where one might previously have a small
selection of Beta tapes, the availability of titles skewed more and
more toward VHS until Beta was pulled.
And again, one could purchase or rent a reasonably mediocre video
copy derived from whatever master happened to be lying around.
And then a new invention appeared. Fronted by IBM, Magnavox and
Universal, the first high quality home theater device - the
laserdisc.
Originally set to sell for $10 - 25 dollars a title, usually based
upon the number of sides, one could now purchase (or rent) titles
like The Blues Brothers,
Psycho, Frankenstein
and other Discovision releases - if they could get them to play.
Produced under less than perfect conditions the typical 4-6 sided
set of discs would normally not play on all sides. If one tried hard
and bought multiple copies, eventually a set could be put together
for which all sides would play reasonably well - of course in pan
and scan, but now with analogue two track audio.
After a short period, the quality of the discs became better,
problems were worked out and the CLV format was born. This enabled
viewing of almost one hour per side. One still had to turn the disc
and once over 118 minutes, go to a second disc. But it worked, and
some masters were produced which had not just been lying around.
And then came CED (Capacitance Electronic Disc System) from RCA.
At just short of two pounds per disc, this encapsulated "high
tech" phonograph record provided an alternative at a lower
quality than laserdisc, with the addition of more video noise. These
actually had a needle contacting a groove; a concept that went back
almost a century.
The Criterion Collection was born on laserdisc in the early 1980s
with an interesting concept.
Create high quality new transfers from superior film elements and
give the public something more.
A special edition.
Widescreen versions of films were made available with commentary
tracks and additional pictorial material.
A superb new format had been created.
People began to collect laserdiscs. The quality got progressively
better along with new masters. There were problems with laser rot
and the picture was still analogue, which meant that it included
video noise. And yet the system worked.
Lasers and their respective players evolved. More films became
available in wide screen based upon new transfers. Audio progressed
from the initial mono and CX encoded to two-track Dolby - which
needed a processor to decode; to early digital tracks (which of
course necessitated a new player); to DTS audio (which of course
necessitated a new player).
But they never really seemed to catch on with the general public.
About 1991 another optical variant was the Phillips created CD-i
system, offering games, educational media and feature films all
conveniently playable on a single unit. The quality was less than
wonderful, the games generally of a lower caliber than might be
found on competing systems, and the system was added to the garbage
heap of technical wizardry than never caught on.
And then something interesting occurred.
In the mid-1990s one began to hear mumblings of a strange
compressed CD format to be called DVD. A single disc could contain
135 minutes of information. Warner Brothers seemed to be taking the
lead under the guidance of Warren Lieberfarb. Universal set up a
special experimental compression center in Universal City.
Sometime during the period when Jim Katz and I were working on the
restoration of Vertigo, we
were invited to the compression center and were able to view some
early experimental DVDs. This was probably sometime in 1995-6.
The quality was amazing.
Based upon brand new transfer picture and audio elements, Universal
had created extremely high quality transfers and pressed them to
DVD. And yet, the feeling was that this was another potentially
high-end system that would interest the mega-users of high-end
hardware. It could be a decade before the general public had any
interest.
What occurred next must have surprised virtually everyone.
Robert Harris
---
Don't forget - you can
CLICK
HERE to discuss this article with Robert and other home
theater enthusiasts online right now at The
Home Theater Forum. |
On
to Part Two
Robert
A. Harris - Main Page |
|