Site
created 12/15/97. |
|
review
added: 7/2/02
U-571
2000
(2002) - Universal
A
Few Words on D-VHS
review
by Dan Kelly and Bill Hunt of The Digital
Bits
|
Film
Rating: C+
Tape Ratings (Video/Audio): A/A
DVD Comparative Ratings (Video/DD Audio/DTS
Audio): C+/A-/A*
*if graded on D-VHS scale
Specs and Features
117 minutes, PG-13, High Definition 1080i, letterboxed widescreen
(2.35:1), 16x9 enhanced, clamshell case packaging, languages:
English (DD 5.1 - 576kbps), subtitles: none, Close Captioned |
U-571
is director Jonathan Mostow's fictional retelling of the capture of
the Enigma technology. The Enigma was a coding device that allowed
the German Navy to communicate in secrecy with their U-boat fleet
during World War II. This technology, along with other coding
devices, allowed the Germans to rule the waters of the Atlantic
(including the eastern seaboard of the United States). To be quite
honest, there's not a whole lot of weight to the story of
U-571. What you've read this
far into the review is the basis of the story. The film also has the
requisite big stars, who are there to get people to see the movie
and to carry it from point A to point B - Harvey Keitel, Bill
Paxton, Matthew McConaughey, Jon Bon Jovi (and a few others thrown
in here and there for good measure).
Because this is a fictitious account of the events that led to the
capture of the Enigma, the director (who also co-wrote the story)
lets himself take quite a few liberties with the sequence of events.
It was, in fact, the British that first captured the Enigma in 1942.
The U.S. Navy DID capture the Enigma decoder, but it wasn't until
almost two years after the British had done so. In effect, the
director shoots himself in the foot by pointing this out in the
footnotes that precede the rolling of the end credits. Does this
alteration of events make the movie any less enjoyable? No, but
shaky story-telling and a failed attempt at patriotism (none of the
characters are performed or written in an exceptionally heroic
manner) keep this film from being anything more than a handful of
great action sequences sewn together loosely with a story that is
nearly stretched beyond the breaking point.
On occasion, Mostow (whose Breakdown
I thought was more fulfilling) loses sight of the story and gets
caught up in the action. At a crucial turning point in the story, a
good portion of the cast is lost in the midst of action, and we
don't find out who's left until long after the smoke clears. This
much of the story I didn't like. But what makes this movie worth
watching are its tense, underwater action sequences. There are
plenty of pumped up explosions and fiery battles to satiate the
appetites of those who miss the days when Schwarzenegger made great
action flicks. If you're in need of a good dose of
testosterone-driven fluff, that's not going to clutter your brain
with otherwise unnecessary information, then look no further than
U-571. If you're looking for a
great story to go along with that, then forget it. This isn't the
movie for you. DK
The video quality of this film on D-VHS is absolutely stunning,
displayed at roughly double the resolution of the DVD video image
(reviewed previously
here).
Submarine movies almost always expose the DVD format's limitations,
by stressing the MPEG-2 decoding with the chaos of falling rain and
splashing water, as well as the murky, undefined blue-greens of the
ocean depths. Not so on the D-VHS. I am amazed at the level of
detail and definition to be found in the picture. Whether it's the
explosion of bubbles during a submarine dive, or the crisp
naturalism of thousands of tiny waves lapping on the ocean surface,
the high-resolution D-VHS picture quality NEVER wavers. There is
tremendous depth exhibited here - damn near as good as you'd see in
a theatrical showing of this film. Never will you see dreaded MPEG-2
compression artifacting. Indeed, at a video bit rate of 28.2 mpbs,
all you're likely to notice is the light film grain inherent in the
source print. There is absolutely none of the edge enhancement seen
in the DVD's picture either. The DVD looks noticeably softer in
terms of overall image quality (in direct A/B comparison) than the
D-VHS version. Colors also appear somewhat less saturated and
overall lacking in fidelity on the DVD. This is true of everything
from subtle fleshtones to bright fireballs. I also noticed a welcome
improvement in contrast here - blacks seem much richer and more
natural on D-VHS, while still retaining exceptional detail in
shadows. As good as the DVD image quality is, it doesn't hold a
candle to the D-VHS version. It's not even close.
The audio quality of the film's Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtrack is
also improved by the D-VHS's 578 kbps bitrate (the DVD is encoded at
448 kbps by comparison), although the difference here is not nearly
as obvious as the picture improvement. The D-VHS audio seems
slightly richer on the low end than the DVD, and I'm not quite sure
which I prefer. However, the D-VHS's soundstage is somewhat
smoother, wider and more coherent than the DVD's (which is, on it's
own, of exceptional sonic quality). There seems to be greater
clarity to the imaging - it sounds more precise than the DVD. I
noticed this particularly during a meal scene on board the sub, in
which cutlery and other assorted dinnerware slides back and forth
across the table as the waves rock the vessel. That fork hitting the
deck always turns my head. Overall, the Dolby Digital D-VHS
soundtrack has a slight edge on its DVD counterpart - not by a great
deal, but the difference is there. I would say that the DTS
soundtrack on the DVD is roughly equal to the D-VHS version however.
Of course, being a linear D-VHS videotape, there are no extras to
be found here. Nothing. Na-da. Even Universal's usual abundance of
marketing fluff is preferable to this. The winner in this category,
except on the most bare-bones, movie-only discs, will always be the
DVD.
Ultimately, the vast majority of you will stick with your DVD
collector's edition versions of U-571.
And you should be quite happy and secure in your decision. The DVD
delivers an excellent rendition of this film for home viewing. But
for those of you who demand only the absolute highest picture and
sound quality from your home theater systems... and who have the
income to justify the added expanse... the D-VHS version is clearly
superior. BH
Dan Kelly
dankelly@thedigitalbits.com
Bill Hunt
billhunt@thedigitalbits.com |
|
|