Site
created 12/15/97. |
|
review
added: 7/2/02
Terminator
2: Judgment Day
1991
(2002) - Carolco/Lightstorm Entertainment (Artisan)
A
Few Words on D-VHS
review
by Bill Hunt, editor of The Digital Bits
|
Film
Rating: B+
Tape Ratings (Video/Audio): B/A
DVD Comparative Ratings (Video/DD Audio/DTS
Audio): C-/B+/A*
*if graded on D-VHS scale
Specs and Features
134 minutes, R, High Definition 1080i, letterboxed widescreen
(2.35:1), 16x9 enhanced, clamshell case packaging, languages:
English (DD 5.1 & 2.0 - 576kbps), subtitles: none, Close
Captioned |
John
Connor: "We're not gonna make it are we? The human race I
mean..."
The Terminator: "It's in your nature to destroy yourselves."
As most of you should know, the original Terminator
saw an android killer from the future (played by Arnold
Schwarzenegger) sent back in time to present day L.A.. It's mission
was simple - kill Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton). You see, there's
this artificial intelligence called SkyNet - yet to be invented -
that will (one day) get placed in control of military computers and
decide to launch a deadly nuclear attack against the human race.
With the future Earth a wasteland, it seems the remaining human
resistance to SkyNet will eventually be led by one John Connor,
Sarah's son. Still following? When SkyNet sends back its Terminator
to kill his mother, the future John sends back a protector (Michael
Biehn) to save her... who will eventually become John's father. So
as the original film wraps up, the Terminator is destroyed, the
protector is killed, and Sarah is pregnant with John.
T2 starts more than a decade
later. Basically, no one believed Sarah and her story about
Terminators from the future and the end of the world, so she's been
locked in the nut house (and they've thrown away the key).
Meanwhile, her now 10-year-old son, John (Edward Furlong), has been
placed in foster care. But, raised as he was by a mother determined
to turn him into a "great military leader", he doesn't
quite fit in with the other kids. Good egg or not, John is still the
key to humanity's future, so SkyNet sends another Terminator back in
time to kill him. And, naturally, John's adult self sends back
another protector. One of these time travellers is played by Robert
Patrick (soon to be of X-Files
fame) and the other is good old Arnold again. The question is, which
one is John's protector and which wants him dead? More importantly,
which one will reach him first? Throw in tons of action, nifty
special effects and a cool subplot about a computer scientist named
Dyson (Joe Morton), who is the inventor of SkyNet because he's found
the pieces of the Terminator from the first film, and you've got a
great, high concept sci-fi story, with plenty of bad-ass cool.
The video quality of this film on D-VHS exhibits a noticeable
improvement in direct A/B comparison to the DVD version (reviewed
here).
However, the difference in quality isn't as great as it is for the
other D-VHS titles I've seen thus far. There is much greater color
fidelity on D-VHS than the disc exhibits (although there does seem
to be a slight red push on the D-VHS version), along with superior
contrast and shadow delineation. As one would expect from the 1080i
resolution, the D-VHS also delivers more subtle (and no-so-subtle)
improvement in detail. Still, the video image looks noticeably
softer overall than the other D-VHS movies I've reviewed, and print
artifacts are somewhat more visible (the occasional bit of dust and
rougher film grain). Strangely, the same tiny bit of edge
enhancement seen on the DVD is also visible on the D-VHS version,
but (as with the DVD) the picture doesn't suffer for it. In the end,
the D-VHS image quality is definitely superior to the DVD, but the
difference isn't as dramatic as I expected. I've only seen a handful
of other D-VHS transfers as of the time of this review, but suspect
that Terminator 2's high-def
image quality will eventually fall in the very good, but not
superior, category.
The sound quality on this D-VHS release is also somewhat improved
over the DVD, but again, not enough to really blow you away. There
is greater clarity and detail in the midrange, but I almost prefer
the DTS version on the Ultimate Edition
DVD. There seems to be slightly more kick to the low end of the mix
on the D-VHS, and there's a greater degree of subtlety in surround
ambience - particularly the film's score. But again, the differences
are not great. The D-VHS's Dolby Digital soundtrack has the marginal
edge on its DVD counterpart, but the disc's DTS track is very close
to the tape in terms of overall sonic quality.
With no extras on this D-VHS version, of course, it's going to be a
tough sell for the vast majority of fans of the film - particularly
given the higher costs to upgrade to the D-VHS format in general.
And while the picture quality is somewhat improved on this
high-definition tape, it's not a knock-out. Bottom line: if you're
looking for reference quality D-VHS video, you might be wise to pick
up a different title instead. I'd recommend staring with Universal's
U-571.
Bill Hunt
billhunt@thedigitalbits.com |
|
|