Site
created 12/15/97. |
|
review
added: 10/22/03
Bowling
for Columbine
Special
Edition - 2002 (2003) - United Artists/Alliance Atlantis
(MGM)
review
by Rob Hale of The Digital Bits
|
Film
Rating: B
Disc Ratings (Video/Audio/Extras): B/B/B-
Specs and Features
Disc One - The Film
119 mins, R, letterboxed widescreen (1.85:1), 16x9 enhanced,
single-sided, dual-layered, keepcase packaging, audio commentary
with receptionists and interns, audio introduction from Michael
Moore, theatrical trailer, animated film-themed menu screens, scene
access (32 chapters), languages: English DD 5.1, subtitles: English
and Spanish, Closed Captioned
|
Disc
Two - Supplemental Materials
Interview with Michael Moore on his Oscar win and acceptance speech
(15 mins), Return to Denver/Littleton
featurette (25 mins), film festival scrapbook (16 mins), Michael
Moore interviewed by former Press Secretary Joe Lockhart (20 mins),
Michael Moore on the Charlie Rose Show (25 mins), Segment
from The Awful Truth II (8 mins), Marilyn Manson's Fight
Song music video, teacher's guide, Mike's action guide,
staff and crew photo gallery, animated film-themed menu screens,
languages: English DD 2.0, subtitles: none, Closed Captioned
"They thought this was going to be another Waco because
certain people, namely my ex-wife, and other people, said I'm a
radical, I'm a wild man..."
- James Nichols
Over the course of two films and two television series, Michael
Moore has taken shots at Nike, Phillip Morris, the Taliban, Borders,
and most famously General Motors. Regardless of his target though,
one thing has remained a constant... Michael Moore and his array of
baseball hats. A shameless self-promoter, Moore has always walked on
the fringes of documentary filmmaking, for better or worse, and
Columbine is no exception.
Using interview and stock footage, guerrilla media manipulation, and
cartoons, to name just a few approaches, Moore creates a pastiche
that still most closely resembles a documentary form, however
uncomfortable the fit may be.
Having seen Columbine on
several occasions now, and in widely different audiences and
situations, I feel I can safely say that the film doesn't
disappoint. It's not that the film will be loved by all, far from
it, but it does achieve what it sets out to do - open up a dialog on
gun death in America. Pulling together interviews with the Michigan
Militia, Matt "South Park"
Stone, Marilyn Manson, James Nichols (brother of Oklahoma City
bomber Terry Nichols), executives from Lockheed Martin and K-Mart,
Charlton Heston and others, Michael Moore examines the nature of gun
death in America from several angles, frequently generating more
questions than any true answers. Moore has been criticized for this
wide 'I'll try anything' scope, but I feel that this broadness is
precisely what makes the film work. By taking such an approach,
Moore's own voice and biases become more non-dogmatic. There is no
single solution. Moore isn't telling us what the solution to gun
violence is, he's participating in an examination of it, and
frequently finds all the solutions, or potential 'scapegoats' he can
come up with not fitting. If anything, Moore comes across as
frustrated because he seemingly can't pin down the problem. Even
those successes he has in the film (getting K-Mart to pull handgun
ammunition from their stores) are tempered by the fact that it is
such a minor thing in the issue he is examining. It's a small
'victory' in an enormous problem.
This being said, Bowling for Columbine
is not a film about gun control (the quicker we can get this out of
our heads the better). Saying that Columbine
is about gun control is akin to saying that Citizen
Kane is about a dead rich guy. Sure the statement may be
true, but it oversimplifies the film to the point of abstraction. It
ignores the complexities that make up the film and give it its true
meaning. So what is it all really about? Well, you could say that
it's about many things: U.S. foreign policy, the media, consumer
culture, even Michael Moore himself. All of these topics would be
just as true as gun control, but at the heart of the film seems to
reside one key issue. Fear.
Fear is the one thing that can be traced through the film, from
beginning to end. The Michigan Militia fear that the police/military
will not always be there to protect them. James Nichols fears
government control. Students are screened for weapons out of fear of
another school shooting. Matt Stone discussed the Columbine tragedy,
explaining that he feels the students were afraid of being failures.
Marilyn Manson discusses consumerism and cultural conditioning to
consume, through fear. Racism's roots are tied directly to fear.
Fear keeps us locking our doors at night. Fear gets us to buy during
the Y2K scare, and post-9/11. Ultimately, 'fear is what drives our
culture,' seems to be what the film is trying to say.
The NRA does play its role in the film and a lot has been said
about it, but I honestly can't understand why because I don't think
that Moore really attacks the NRA as an institution. If Moore really
wanted to belittle or attack the NRA, at its core, he would not give
them a voice. He would not admit that there isn't necessarily a
connection between gun ownership and gun violence, and he would not
state flat out that he believes in the second amendment. It really
seems that the major problem that he has with the NRA is what he
sees as its insensitivity when the organization comes to Denver and
Flint to hold conventions while the communities are still recovering
from gun-related tragedies. Is this really such a horrible 'attack?'
He's not calling for the NRA to be abolished, just to show a little
sensitivity, right or wrong. The only other criticism I can see made
about the NRA is one that seems to be at the heart of the film (and
the interview with Charlton Heston), which is to stop reducing the
issue of gun violence down to political soundbites that do nothing
to develop an intelligent discourse about it, because we're dealing
with a problem that's killing a lot of people. The issue is bigger
than we seem to be thinking at the moment. Perhaps we're afraid of
the truth?
For better or for worse though, Moore's film may always be simply
connected to the NRA and the gun control issue. This is perhaps the
one great fault that the film has - picking on the NRA a bit too
much when he has ample evidence and ideas to work with. In all
fairness though, the NRA is a major player in the politics of the
issues at hand, and Moore is an 'active' filmmaker who will try to
get his hands dirty. I can only imagine how still and stale this
film would have been without Moore's biases being on display.
Columbine is so very effective
because Moore does take sides, but only occasionally does his
viewpoint 'win.' After all, what can Moore really say about gun
violence? It's a complicated set of issues that could never be
answered in a simple two-hour film watched over a bucket of popcorn,
and thankfully Moore doesn't try to answer them. Rather than
oversimplify the issue, Moore tries to expose as many of the
complexities as he can, piling information on top of more
information, and asking us to think about it, talk about it, yell at
it... just don't ignore it.
MGM's disc is a perfectly fine representation of the film, which
looked pretty bad in the theaters. Using stock footage, video
sources and 'cheaper' film stocks, the film is riddled with grainy
and fuzzy images, which makes this transfer look pretty good. Colors
are nice, and detail is about as fine as you can get considering the
source. Overall, the film plays better in a home theater
environment, since the smaller image makes the grain less noticeable
and it just seems better for the video footage. The audio is pretty
utilitarian, but dialog is clear and the overall sound is clean and
balanced. Let's face it... this isn't reference quality material,
but it is more than acceptable for the film.
Extras are a very mixed bag. Disc One contains an introduction,
which is okay but nothing vital, and a commentary track from the
secretaries and interns that worked on the film, which is just plain
bad. I waited for thirty minutes for someone to say anything
meaningful about the film, and it never came. I'm still waiting.
Disc Two does a little better, but is ultimately overkill. Each of
the featurettes seem like they would be fine on their own, but
placed together there is so much overlap that it gets a little
tiresome. That's not to say there isn't interesting stuff here, but
be prepared to hear the same stories a few times. The rest of the
features are rounded out by a clip from Moore's TV series,
The Awful Truth, Marilyn
Manson's Fight Song video, a
photo gallery, and a couple of DVD-ROM features that I couldn't get
to do anything in my computer.
Overall, get the disc for the film. MGM's disc shows the film
itself justice, but I would have liked to see a little more meat
(and not as much repetition) to the extras. Columbine
is flawed, but important viewing nonetheless because Michael Moore
achieves what he set out for, which is to generate discussion. Don't
worry if you don't think you'll agree with Moore's political
viewpoint (and many of you won't)... you're needed in the discussion
as well.
Rob Hale
nirayo@yahoo.com |
|
|