Site created 12/15/97. |
|
review added: 7/31/99
Payback
1999 (1999) - Paramount
review by Todd Doogan,
special to The Digital Bits
|
Film
Rating: B-
Disc Ratings (Video/Audio/Extras): A/A/B-
Specs and Features
101 mins, R, letterboxed widescreen (1.85:1), 16x9 enhanced,
single-sided, single-layered, Amaray keep case packaging, "making
of" featurette, theatrical and teaser trailers, film-themed
menu screens, scene access (18 chapters), languages: English (DD 5.1
& DD 3.0), French (DD 3.0), subtitles: English, Close Captioned |
Richard Stark's pulp
novel icon "Parker", is one of my favorite literary
characters that's ever been created. He's a no-nonsense,
take-no-prisoners, shoot first, ask questions later kind of guy. You
have to admire that. Parker has popped up in quite a few films,
although he has only been called Parker in one of them -- a
gawdawful film starring Peter Coyote based on (and entitled) Slayground.
Let's see... Parker's been in two French films, one entitled Mise
à Sac (based on The
Score). He's been black in The
Split (based on The Seventh),
starring Jim Brown. And he's even been played by a woman in the
other French film Made in U.S.A.
(based on The Jugger),
directed by Jean-Luc Godard. The other "Parker" films are
The Outfit, starring Robert
Duvall, and of course, Point Blank
(based on The Hunter) with the
ultimate actor-as-Parker, Lee Marvin. In all, there have been 18
Parker novels (a 19th is due out next year) to make great movies out
of. Well 18, and for the completists out there, Parker also appears
in the Stark novel Child Heist
(which was made into a Gary Coleman vehicle, Jimmy
the Kid). Three of the above films are owned by Warner
(via their ownership of the classic MGM library): The
Split, The Outfit
and Point Blank, so anyone
with a serious Parker fixation, can bombard the WB for some quality
DVDs of their favorite mad dog criminal.
The apparent reason for the lack of the name of Parker in most of
the films, is that Donald E. Westlake, the creator of Parker (and of
the pseudonym Richard Stark), would rather they didn't use the name
unless a franchise is created. Good for him. It's a character built
for repeats, and with 18 source novels, he could have a long screen
life (especially when you know that Parker doesn't have a problem
with reconstructing his face, so many actors could play him through
a long series of films). Suffice it to say, Payback
keeps the name game (and the anti-franchise ideal) alive, with the
addition of "Porter", played here by Mel Gibson.
Payback is a remake of that
Lee Marvin film, Point Blank
(uhm... Warner? Hello? You got rights now -- you gonna release this
wonderful film or what?). Payback
follows our anti-hero through his mission to get back his half of a
score, stolen from him by his "best friend" and his wife,
after they shot him and left him for dead. Porter doesn't care what
he has to do -- he wants his money. That's what dragged his butt off
the ground, and onto the operating table of a crooked surgeon. So
how much money would basically force a man to come back from the
dead you ask? Seventy grand -- not a whole lot in the world of
high-rolling criminal types, but it's not about the money anymore
for Porter. It's about revenge.
Porter encounters a wide range of seedy types on his adventure
through the underworld. There's a hot dominatrix (played by Ally
McBeal's Lucy Liu), there's a pair of immoral cops who
want their piece of the action (played by character actor Jack
Conley, and director Bill Duke), and who could forget the weasel
Stegman, played by David Paymer (when's he gonna get an Oscar?). All
in all, it's a fun movie, with great characters, some wonderful
lines, and Gibson (who is pretty good as the Parker-like character).
But the problem with all that, is that Parker isn't supposed to be
fun. Parker is dark, forbidding and tense. This new version is dark,
sure (with Gibson's trademark torture scene). But it's also
light-hearted, funny, and in a way, happy. Parker (in the world
created by Stark/Westlake) doesn't have feelings for anyone, and if
he does, he pushes them way down and operates like a shark. I was
very disappointed by the film overall, even though I loved the
camerawork, the stylized look of the film (Is it the 70s? Is it the
90s? Are we in Chicago? Are we in N.Y.? The answer to all is yes.),
and that whole 70s crime drama soundtrack.
Most of the things I liked about the film, were left over from the
original director's vision. Brian Helgeland (Oscar winner for his
script to L.A. Confidential)
wrote and directed Payback,
and if he'd had his way, it would have been a pretty faithful
adaptation of the Stark novel. Gibson must have had second thoughts
on playing such an unredeemable character, and pulled rank, stepping
in to have about 30 percent of the film reshot to take the edge of
the character, and make him more lovable. I wish Gibson would have
sucked it up and let Helgeland have his vision -- the film would
have been that much better for it. As it stands, the film was a C+
in theaters, but it could have easily been an A.
Payback on DVD makes the film
watching experience a little bit better. Everything I like about
Payback really shines on DVD.
The 16x9 widescreen transfer is super. The soundtrack comes alive on
disc, and overall, seeing the film again in the comfort of my home
has made my dislike for this film fade a bit (thus the slightly
higher film rating). Starting with the transfer, Payback
has a cool (as in cold, detached) look that lends itself totally to
DVD. The bleached look of the film, the shiny leathers, the steely
cityscapes -- it all simply looks wonderful here (and much, much
better than it did in theaters). The sound is just as good. The
soundstage is nicely developed -- gun shots resonate, thuds vibrate,
and that ultra-smooth soundtrack brings me back to a time when crime
films spit in your eye, and stole your wallet. It's a wonderful
sounding and looking disc. The DVD doesn't skimp too much on extras,
either. There is a "making of" featurette (a simple
rah-rah marketing piece), and the trailer and teaser trailers for
the film (that both show cut footage). It has more extras than most
Paramount discs, but I would have liked a commentary track with
Gibson and Helgeland discussing the cuts (fat chance), or even the
alternate vision of the film on side B (even fatter chance). That
would have made this a must-own DVD. As it is, the DVD was at least
given some attention in production, so Paramount scores some extra
points from me on that front.
I'm hardly the one to be reviewing Payback
for the unbiased opinion. I was disappointed, but I see how the film
could have fans. It is well made, but not very true to its origins.
Gibson is great, and if you're a fan, you'll love him in this. The
film does deserve to be seen, simply based on the quality of the
disc, and the wonderful look of the film. I'd recommend it for those
who think they'll like it. As for the rest of us, we'll wait for
Point Blank to come on DVD
(Warner... you listening?).
Todd Doogan
todddoogan@thedigitalbits.com |
|
|