Site created 12/15/97. |
|
review added: 6/1/99
In Dreams
1999 (1999) - DreamWorks
S.K.G.
review by Bill Hunt,
editor of The Digital Bits
|
Film
Rating: B-
In Dreams is an interesting,
but at times melodramatic, phycological thriller. I wasn't expecting
this film to be quite as dark as it is, but Annette Bening gives an
interesting enough performance to redeem it.
Disc Ratings (Video/Audio/Extras):
A+/A/C+
The anamorphic widescreen video quality is absolutely first-rate,
and the Dolby Digital 5.1 audio is equally well presented. Love
these menus man - very nicely done. A couple of extras round it out.
Overall Rating: A-
The film isn't going to be everyone's cup of tea, but the disc
packs enough premo quality to really please. If you like the genre,
you'll not want to miss this one. |
Specs
and Features
100 mins, R, letterboxed widescreen (1.85:1), 16x9 enhanced,
single-sided, single-layered, Amaray keep case packaging, theatrical
trailer, production notes, cast & crew bios, film-themed menu
screens with animation and sound effects, scene access (21
chapters), languages: English (DD 5.1), subtitles: English, Close
Captioned
Review
Claire Cooper has everything going for her in life - she's got a
beautiful daughter, a devoted (if often absent) airline pilot
husband, a gorgeous New England house, and a successful career as an
author of children's books. But Claire has been having nightmares.
She's plagued with visions that she doesn't understand, of children
meeting their untimely demise. That's bad enough, but soon Claire
sees on the local TV news that children really are going missing in
her area, and it suddenly becomes clear to her that she's not just
having visions, but full-on premonitions of their deaths.
Unfortunately, when she tries to convince her husband and the
police, she learns that the information she can provide is of little
use - she doesn't see enough detail to help find the children before
it's too late. That's a pretty nasty thing to have to live with, but
it gets worse. The stakes are raised, when Claire's own daughter
suddenly goes missing. And soon her visions change - she starts
seeing images of a little boy being abused and abandoned by his
mother. Claire begins to understand that the visions she sees in her
head are being placed there by the killer himself, who seems to be
daring her to find him.
As physiological thrillers go, In Dreams
is definitely ruthless in its efforts to raise the dramatic stakes
for its main character, and for the audience. The film was directed
by veteran Neil Jordan (who also gave us The
Crying Game, Michael Collins
and Interview with the Vampire),
and he weaves a tight tapestry here. Unfortunately, he can't quite
prevent his film from perhaps being a little too ruthless. I'm going
to try not to give too much away, but it isn't long before all of
the things which ground Claire in her life are stripped away,
leaving her to twist in the wind, with a killer taunting her in her
head. Annette Bening gives a terrific performance here, there's no
doubt. But a very talented supporting cast is quickly left behind as
the story becomes one of Claire's detective work to figure the
killer out. Her psychologist (played by Stephen Rea) isn't much
help. Neither is her husband (Aidan Quinn), who gets quickly
frustrated with her. And the local police detective trying to make
sense of the crimes isn't very effective either (despite Paul
Guifoyle's interesting performance).
Ultimately, and perhaps appropriately, the story focuses completely
on Claire, and the killer in her head... and that's where things
start to go downhill. It's no secret that the killer is played by
Robert Downey, Jr - all you have to do is watch the trailer to
figure that one out. And while I think he's an amazingly talented
actor, he isn't quite equal to the build-up of this story. I
expected a face much more sinister... much more worthy of the
viciousness of his crimes and the ruthlessness of his actions.
Perhaps that's the point - killers aren't always the monsters we
expect them to be, they're the guys next door who just crack. Still,
after riding out the rapids of this film, I expected a more
satisfying killer. Maybe it would have been better if we just didn't
know it was Downey in the first place - maybe that's a marketing
problem. His identity is no surprise, which undermines the dramatic
payoff. Sadly, too many films these days are spoiled by trailers
which give everything away. In any case, In
Dreams builds tension nicely, almost cruelly, but fails
to pay off almost entirely. There's no happy ending here. Still, the
ride is interesting two-thirds of the way at least, and some nice
performances make it worth a watch.
In Dreams, however, is another
one of those discs that makes me happy that DreamWorks has thrown
their hats into the DVD arena. The quality of the disc is superb. To
start with, the film is presented in simply gorgeous anamorphic
widescreen. The print quality is excellent, and it's been nicely
transferred and compressed digitally for DVD. This is a film which
takes place in a pastoral New England setting, so the colors are
rich and warm. And there's a nice contrast here too - there's a
subplot about a drowned town (a very eerie and nifty story point),
so there's a lot of underwater photography, which adds some cool
blue hues into the mix. The director of photography (Darius Khondji,
who also worked on Seven, Evita
and Alien: Resurrection) has
simply outdone himself here, conjuring a terrifically dark,
atmospheric look to this film. The film is very noirish visually -
even the brightly-lit daytime scenes are unsettling. The picture on
this DVD is also richly detailed, with particularly deep, yet
detailed, blacks and great contrast. All in all, a very pleasing
visual experience is presented.
The audio is nearly as good. The soundstage is deep and wide, with
dialogue and music appropriately mixed. Most of the time, the audio
is nicely atmospheric, with the rear channels filling in the picture
tastefully. Listen to the sounds of an air tank respirator
underwater, or ambient sounds in the forest - very appropriately
presented. But, as with the visuals, the audio also contains a nice
contrast. Once the setting of the film moves from physical reality,
to the subjective setting of Claire's visions, all bets are off, and
great fun is had with panning and surround effects. The rear
channels are used to great effect, as the killer taunts Claire from
all around. The bass channel is not explosive, but is well used
where needed. In short, the audio reinforces the visuals nicely.
The disc also includes a couple of light extras - not nearly as
much as other DreamWorks titles, but still, you get a theatrical
trailer of excellent quality, several pages of production notes, and
some biographies of the cast and crew. And man, do I love
DreamWorks' DVD menu work! Every disc they've done so far just has
all of those cool little touches, you know? Great, hassle-free disc
navigation, and well-designed animated menu screens. DreamWorks puts
as much thought into the presentation quality of their discs, as
they put into the video and audio of the movies themselves, and it
shows. Their disc menus are incredibly user-friendly, and fun to
look sift through - the perfect way to get you in the mood to watch
the film. It just makes me wish the studio had more films to release
on DVD.
Bottom line
In Dreams isn't going to make
everyone happy. The film will be too dark for some, and probably too
predictable for others. But Annette Bening's performance, and some
nicely constructed visuals early on, make the disc well worth a
spin. I definitely found the ride interesting, even if the film's
ending left me wanting. And if the video, audio and navigation
quality on a DVD are important to you, this disc is a textbook
example of how things should be done. From any other studio, this
would probably have been a pretty boring, bare-bones disc - think
Warner's budget line. DreamWorks, on the other hand, makes even
their least feature-packed discs worth a look - a very nifty trick
indeed.
Bill Hunt
billhunt@thedigitalbits.com |
|
|