Hello,
Superfriends. Welcome back to Ye Olde
Electric Theatre. For some reason, Im feeling
particularly egalitarian this week. As a result, well have no
A-Picture and nothing in the
Hell Plaza Octoplex. Instead,
for this weeks spotlight feature, lets use a term thats
somewhat more accurate...
The
Big Picture - Superman Returns
First off, despite my life-long love affair with comics, Ive
never been a huge fan of Superman. Like just about everyone else in
the world, Ive read a few of his comics but apart from a short
time in the 1980s, I never collected any Superman title. Ive
always liked the character more in theory than in practice and have
found more to enjoy in the movies starring Christopher Reeve than
anywhere else. The first one is swell but Superman
II is still my favorite, no matter what anybody says
about its muddled production, and I can even find good things to say
about Superman III. However, I
apologized to the friends Id talked into going to see the
truly horrible Superman IV
with me, at least one of whom reads this column regularly (Chris,
once again, Im very, very sorry). So my expectations were
reasonably high going into Superman
Returns. More than anything else, I wanted this movie to
give me a reason to like Superman again. And to some extent, I got
just that. With state-of-the-art special effects and a reliance on
John Williams great musical themes, Bryan Singer has made a
Superman movie every bit as gigantic as its larger-than-life hero.
Its an eye-popping spectacle that rarely asks you to suspend
your disbelief that a man can fly. Its also a bit of an
oddity, an attempt to relaunch a franchise for a new generation by
being beholden to movies made over twenty years ago. Naturally, it
is not a seamless join. Perhaps the biggest hurdle Singer has to
jump is in his casting, asking his actors to create characters of
their own while remaining true to the spirit, if not the letter, of
the iconic performances of Christopher Reeve, Margot Kidder, Gene
Hackman, and pals. Its a thankless task that shouldnt be
wished on any actor and its to these actors credit that
they dont fumble the ball entirely. Brandon Routh probably isnt
going to make anyone forget about Reeve. He has the authority and
presence to carry off the role but he almost never looks like hes
having any fun. Even his smiles seem slightly tinged with sadness. A
lot of this is inherent in the story Singer has chosen to tell. Even
so, Reeve was able to pull off calling Lex Luthor a diseased
maniac with a lot more flair than Routh probably could. Kate
Bosworth is slightly more problematic as Lois Lane, doing everything
right but still coming off as a lot more passive and characterless
than Kidder. Having said that, I cant think of another actress
in her age group Id have chosen instead. Maybe its just
a generational difference that makes Bosworths Lois seem so
much less interesting than Kidders. The rest of the cast is
mostly terrific. Kevin Spacey makes for a great Luthor and Parker
Posey is surprisingly fun as his moll du jour. So with all this
going for it, why didnt I love this movie without
reservations? First off, there were a few too many references to
Richard Donners original for my tastes. Some of them are
inspired but when dialogue is repeated almost verbatim not once but
repeatedly for no apparent reason, you begin to wonder if the
screenwriters just couldnt think of anything original to say.
Worse still is the movies uneven pace which builds to a
crescendo, then sputters and stalls, then rebuilds itself again.
And, like most movies nowadays, this one takes an eternity to end.
But the biggest flaw with the movie is that Singer and his team dont
seem all that interested in Clark Kent. Its not simply that
nobody notices that Clark and Superman have both been gone for
exactly five years and both suddenly turn up out of nowhere on the
exact same day. Its that nobody at the Daily Planet seems to
have even noticed or cared that Clark was gone at all. Clark Kent
isnt just a cloak of invisibility that Kal-El can shrug into
whenever he doesnt feel like being Superman anymore. Its
the face of the humanity he learned from his adoptive parents in
Smallville. Without it, hes exactly what Luthor accuses him of
being: an alien god who thinks hes better than the rest of us.
It was the dichotomy between the two personas that made Reeves
Superman so astonishing and there are enough glimpses of it here to
make one hope that Routh can grow into the roles just as
comfortably. I hope he does because as a foundation for a presumed
series of films, Superman Returns
feels like its painted itself into an uncomfortable corner. I
dont want to give anything away but the way things are left at
films end seems to present fairly limited story options... or
at least, limited interesting story options. You could make an
infinite number of movies after this just following the status quo
but I think theyd get tedious fairly quickly. Lets hope
Singer or whoever takes the reins next has some aces up their
sleeve. But for now, Superman Returns
is an enjoyable reintroduction to a character who needs no
introduction. And maybe the fact that I didnt enjoy it as much
as Id hoped simply proves what Kal-El learned during his five
years away from Earth. You cant go home again.
(* * *)
Nacho Libre
I like Jack Black. I like Mexican wrestling. Therefore, I reasoned,
I should like Nacho Libre, the new comedy with Jack Black as a
priest with a secret life as a luchador. Unfortunately, things didnt
quite work out that way. I havent seen Napoleon
Dynamite, director Jared Hess previous claim to
fame, and if this is any indication of what Im in for, Im
not going to be sticking it at the top of my Netflix queue any time
soon. This is a sloppy, half-finished movie that feels more like a
rough cut than a finished feature. Its as if they hadnt
figured out the timing of the jokes yet and couldnt be
bothered to finish the job. Hess displays a fondness for farts and
little else. Not fart jokes, as that would imply some comedic point
to them. No, this movie just includes random farts for no reason at
all. Black is an engaging personality and what little energy the
movie has rests entirely on his shoulders. But hes not such a
magnetic screen presence that he can keep this mess from collapsing
around him. (* *)
So if you hated this movie so much, Jahnke, I hear you
ask, why isnt it in the Octoplex?
One reason, my friend. I saw it at the Vineland Drive-In here in the
beautiful Southland of California which is the perfect venue to see
such a shambolic half-movie unspool. If youve never been to a
drive-in (and part of me cant quite believe that some of you
probably havent), youre missing out. Projected beneath
the stars, with trains barreling past, kids running around and in
the company of good friends, a movies flaws all seem highly
forgivable. If Id seen Nacho Libre
in a movie theatre, Id have been pissed off at myself for
wasting my time and money. At the drive-in, I just shrugged it off
and still had a good time. If you live near one, or even if you dont,
I encourage you to load up the car and support your local drive-in.
Rumors of their death have been slightly exaggerated.
Over the Hedge
This was the co-feature with Nacho Libre
at the Vineland, otherwise I probably never would have seen it (and
if wed turned around to look at the screen behind us a little
earlier, Id have been writing about The
Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift right now instead).
Kind of an odd choice for a drive-in but Im glad I saw it.
Bruce Willis voices RJ, a raccoon who cons a group of docile
foragers into helping him steal a bunch of food from a newly-built
housing development to replace what he lost stealing from a
hibernating bear. Like too many recent animated movies, Over
the Hedge has more than enough pop culture references
that are supposedly supposed to entertain both parents and kids. I
think both are more likely to enjoy the moments that are clearly
influenced by classic Looney Tunes
cartoons, including the Bugs-and-Daffy like byplay between Willis
and Garry Shandling as Verne the turtle and Stella the skunk (voiced
by Wanda Sykes, as usual rising above her material) disguising
herself as a cat to distract a lovestruck house pet. Over
the Hedge is no classic but its a cute and often
funny cartoon with some impressive animation that is probably better
seen anywhere other than on a repainted, patched-up drive-in screen.
(* * ½)
Now
on DVD...
2046
Ive been getting into the films of Hong Kong auteur Wong
Kar-Wai lately but the charms of his latest eluded me somewhat. In
fact, it took me two attempts to make it through this semi-sequel to
In The Mood for Love. Tony
Leung is a writer who works for the paper and spends his night
writing science fiction stories that are in fact allegories for his
own past relationships. Like every other Wong Kar-Wai film Ive
seen, 2046 is absolutely
gorgeous to look at. But this time the amazing visuals were working
in service of a story that goes nowhere slowly. The films
champions will no doubt tell me its all very poetic and
atmospheric. It may well be and like most poetry, what you get out
of it is purely subjective. For me, 2046
was a not particularly original rumination on love and loss that
told me nothing I hadnt already heard from earlier, better
movies, stories and poems. (* * ½)
Running Scared
On the other end of the scale of movies I just didnt get, youll
find this bizarro action movie starring Paul Walker as a mobster on
a frantic all-night chase to retrieve a stolen gun that was used to
kill some dirty cops. Ill give it this much. Running
Scared is anything but routine. The movie takes more
uncontrolled left turns than a soapbox derby racer. And Im all
for that. But even on its own terms, this thing makes precious
little sense. It lost me entirely about a third of the way in when
Walkers son actually gets the gun back from his friend and
stupidly decides to hide it in a toilet tank for reasons known only
to the screenwriter. Mix in a third-act twist that contradicts just
about everything weve seen so far and the worst tacked-on
happy ending since the non-directors cut of Blade
Runner and youve got yourself a recipe for a
love-it-or-hate-it cult movie that will either dazzle you with its
kinetic style (which admittedly it has in spades) or leave you cold.
Guess which side of the fence Im on. (*
½)
All right, folks. Clear the area. Nothing more to see here. See you
back here in two weeks, at which point itll be a pirates
life for me.
Adam Jahnke
ajahnke@thedigitalbits.com
Dedicated to Vincent Sherman
"Electric Theatre - Where You See All
the Latest Life Size Moving Pictures, Moral and Refined, Pleasing to
Ladies, Gentlemen and Children!"
- Legend on a traveling moving picture show tent, c.1900 |