Greetings
once again, lovers of the filmic arts. I hope you're having a great
summer, full of barbecues, softball games, trips to the beach, and
hangin out down by the pool. And don't give me that old but
it isn't even Memorial Day yet excuse. According to the
tastemakers in Hollywood, summer officially kicked off two weeks
ago. And as George Clooney told us at the Oscars recently, Hollywood
is ahead of the curve on most everything so you'd better catch up.
Put on those bathing suits and go for a swim! Hollywood doesn't care
if it's too cold and neither should you.
I'll get to the currently released crop of would-be blockbusters in
a moment but, to the surprise of hopefully no one, they aren't my
A-Picture this week. In fact,
I have two excellent movies to recommend before we put our brains in
neutral, so let's dive right in.
The
A-Picture - United 93
I watched the controversy surrounding Paul Greengrass United
93 unfold with some fascination. By now you're no doubt
familiar with the hue and cry. Is it too soon? Should the film have
been made at all? The whole thing was very revealing. Not so much
about the unresolved emotions Americans are still struggling with
almost five years after 9/11 but about the assumptions and
prejudices people have toward film. I can promise you, if this had
been a novel or a play or a TV-movie, there would have been none of
this. Indeed, the same story already has been a TV-movie, the
similarly titled Flight 93. If
you missed the uproar over that version, it's because there wasn't
any. But when the story is told as a feature film with a theatrical
release and major studio money behind it, suddenly it becomes a
major issue. Partly because the theatrical movie-going experience is
so overwhelming. Other mediums offer escapes. You can put a book
down. TV offers periodic breaks in the action and on the few
channels that don't, most television sets are still smaller than
you. Even live theatre has the artifice of its sets to remind you
that what you're watching is staged. But film surrounds you, filling
your eyes and ears. Also, Hollywood doesn't exactly have a great
track record when it comes to telling true stories with honesty,
integrity and sensitivity. It isn't impossible to find films that
succeed at doing so. It's just really, really hard.
Fortunately, United 93 is one
of those rare exceptions. Did those story need to be told?
Absolutely, and the fact that it was told so soon after the actual
event gives the film an immediacy that a later production would have
lacked. What the terrorists pulled off on 9/11 was nothing short of
an extraordinary act of war. The only thing more chilling than their
plan is the fact that we were unable to stop it from happening.
Greengrass cuts back and forth from flight 93 to events unfolding
with the military, the FAA and at Air Traffic Control centers in New
York, Boston and Cleveland. Almost everyone's first reaction to
being told of a possible hijack situation is, Seriously?
And of course, it would be. No one thought such a thing was a
possible back then. Meanwhile, the tension builds on flight 93 and
Greengrass expertly puts us right there on board the plane. These
passengers took truly heroic action that day. Most of us will never
have to make such a sacrifice and this film gives us as much of an
idea of what it takes to do just that as we're likely to want. I
didn't know what to expect from United 93.
I personally did not lose anyone that day. Like so many of us, I
watched things unfold from thousands of miles away on television. If
you're like me, the memory of 9/11 is burned in your mind forever
but the real impact of it has faded with time. United
93 vividly reminds us of a day we should never forget or
allow to be diminished by the vagaries of memory. If you think
you're not ready to watch it, you're probably right and you
shouldn't. This is an shatteringly intense, deeply powerful and
moving film. One day, when 9/11 has become history instead of a
current event whose repercussions are still being felt and, quite
frankly, are far from being resolved, United
93 will stand as a tribute to those who lost their lives
that horrible day in 2001. (****)
Art School Confidential
Terry Zwigoff hasn't really made enough movies yet to be considered
one of my favorite filmmakers but he's getting close. Ghost
World was my pick of the best film of 2001 and now he's
reunited with writer/artist Daniel Clowes for a caustic satire set
in the easily-parodied world of fine art and art school. And if Art
School Confidential isn't as assured as their previous
collaboration, it's still top-notch. Max Minghella stars as Jerome,
a freshman at the Strathmore Institute majoring in drawing and
painting. He claims to have aspirations to be a great artist but is
in fact much more interested in winning the heart of Audrey (Sophia
Myles), a life model he's been nursing a crush on ever since seeing
her photo in Strathmore's brochure. John Malkovich is very funny as
Jerome's bored professor and Jim Broadbent is great as a burned-out
Strathmore alum. This movie isn't for everyone. There are virtually
no sympathetic characters, although I thought Matt Keeslar was very
likable as Jonah, Jerome's mysterious rival. When I saw this, I
could literally feel the audience rejecting the movie as the main
character became less tolerable. I thought it was a gamble that paid
off. Art School Confidential
is as nihilistic and cynical a movie as you're likely to find but
it's staged with wit and intelligence. If you're unable to embrace
its ice cold worldview, steer clear. I thought it was a jolting
tonic to the vapid, cookie-cutter sameness of so many other campus
comedies. (*** ½)
Mission: Impossible III
OK, blockbuster time. Tom Cruise returns as Ethan Hunt, the IMF
agent we've followed through two previous impossible missions. Now
he's about to get married and pulled back into the field to rescue a
protégé who's been kidnapped by Philip Seymour
Hoffman, an arms dealer after the Rabbit's Foot, a device that...
well, the movie never actually bothers to explain what exactly it
does but it must be bad cause he wants it so much. TV guru
J.J. Abrams has been handed the directing reins for this installment
and he delivers at least two really good action sequences that are
almost worth the price of admission. Almost. M:i:III
is a step up from the last movie, a ridiculous affair which almost
succeeded as a John Woo self-parody. I had two main problems with
this movie. The first is the same as I've had with every one of
these movies. Tom Cruise simply looks ridiculous when he runs or
does any kind of big physical action. His voice goes way up high
when he gets excited and he gets these goofy looks on his face when
exerting himself. I probably would too but then again, I'm not
trying to headline a major action franchise. Second, I can
understand Cruise and Abrams wanting to mix things up by going the this
time it's personal route with this. But really, who cares?
We've only seen this character in two other movies and have only the
vaguest idea who he is. Hell, I could barely remember his name was
Ethan in the over-half-a-decade wait between sequels. Even so,
Hoffman makes for a memorable villain and it's fun to see him in a
movie he actually got paid for, for a change. Abrams is a skilled
director of over-the-top action and I'll consider seeing whatever he
does next. But if this turns out to be the final Mission,
I won't shed too many tears and I doubt anyone else will either.
(** ½)
Now
Playing at the Hell Plaza Octoplex - Poseidon
Never before have I seen a movie that seemed so costly and employed
so many people that seemed so lazy. 1972's The
Poseidon Adventure is no American movie classic, no
matter how many times it might turn up on that channel, but it's
good fun if you're in the mood for some disaster cheese on the high
seas. The only reason Poseidon
exists at all is because somebody somewhere thought it would be cool
to see a ship turn over using today's visual effects. And indeed it
is. For about five minutes, the good ship Poseidon capsizes in full
CGI-enhanced glory, rendered in fetishistic detail with bodies
floating around and tiny computer-generated chairs sailing out of
windows. It's pretty neat, providing you can get past the idea that
the crew of a ship with more high-tech naval gadgets on board than a
nuclear submarine doesn't notice a rogue wave roughly
the size of the Continental Divide until it's literally right on top
of them. But after that, you're stuck with characters from a Random
Movie Generator struggling through standard Perils-of-Pauline-style
pitfalls as they scramble for a way up and out. There's Kurt Russell
as the former mayor of New York, Emmy Rossum as his firebrand
daughter, Josh Lucas as a professional gambler who may actually be
named Grifty McGrift, and Richard Dreyfuss as a suicidal gay
architect nursing a broken heart. And they've got to cross chasms,
and they've got to shimmy up air ducts, and they've got to swim
underwater for a lung-achingly long time, and you've seen every one
of these disaster scenarios done in a zillion other movies, usually
much better. Wolfgang Petersen is a fine director (Das
Boot) who occasionally makes some incredibly ludicrous
crap (Outbreak) but usually
even his crap is more entertaining than this. If nothing else,
however, Poseidon does earn my
respect for being one of the only remakes I can think of that is
actually shorter than the original. At just 99 minutes, Poseidon
is a waste of time but at least it's not a waste of a lot of time.
(* ½)
That'll do it for this week. Next time, I'll attempt to unravel
The Da Vinci Code and I'll
take a stand either for or against X-Men:
The Last Stand. And since the current TV season is
wrapping up, maybe I'll even have some thoughts on the last year's
worth of shows like 24 and
Lost. Until next time, keep on
truckin'.
Adam Jahnke
ajahnke@thedigitalbits.com
Dedicated (long overdue) to Noa
Jahnke-Lesire... congratulations Peter and Rachelle from Uncle Adam
"Electric Theatre - Where You See All
the Latest Life Size Moving Pictures, Moral and Refined, Pleasing to
Ladies, Gentlemen and Children!"
- Legend on a traveling moving picture show tent, c.1900 |